Tell Us What You Think
Which values should inform the design of federal buildings, campuses and public spaces in the National Capital Region?
What others have said, weighted by popularity
accessibility
activity
awe-inspiring
beauty
bikeable
classicism
comfortable
community-building
convenience
cost-effectiveness
defensibility
democracy
density
efficiency
expressiveness
flexibility
food-growing
friendliness
fun
functional
grandeur
greenery
inclusiveness
innovation
inspiration
LEED
light
mixed-use
modernism
monumentalism
multi-modalism
multi-use
multiple-use
nature
openness
order
pedestrianism
permanence
permeability
pet-friendly
place-making
purpose
recreation
regionalism
responsible
safety
security
senior-friendly
sensitivity
simplicity
smallness
smart
sociable
sophisticated
spaciousness
street-activating
street-facing
sustainability
technology
timelessness
transit
urbanism
vistas
walkability
welcoming
connectivity
elegance
vibrancy
egalitarianism
warmth
human-scale
style
artfulness
Recently submitted feedback
daniel lind wants to see friendliness, openness, accessibility, walkability and permanence inform the design of federal buildings, installations and public spaces in the National Capital Region.
John C Coe wants to see inspiration, walkability, comfortable, timelessness and activity inform the design of federal buildings, installations and public spaces in the National Capital Region.
R. Ward thinks that the design of federal buildings in the National Capital Region should be informed by pedestrianism, simplicity, multiple-use, bikeable and monumentalism.